tw. what's your most contropersial take

djsenter — Post 261 of 281

#261 2026-09-15 13:09

What you said still suggests that taking substances is healthy, while it really isn't :D

Senter San

Fernando — Post 262 of 281

#262 2026-09-18 06:54

@218 I'm starting to come around to your 9th point.

Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

Reynolds — Post 263 of 281

#263 2026-09-18 11:35

My question becomes from the side of the compinies making the models shouldn't regulate it, or the governments shouldn't regulate it?

Fernando — Post 264 of 281

#264 2026-09-18 17:47

The government

Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

whereismyepipen — Post 265 of 281

#265 2026-09-20 19:02

I like women. Idk if yall agree.

Fernando — Post 266 of 281

#266 2026-09-20 19:03

Hard disagree.

Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

khalil2009 — Post 267 of 281

#267 2026-09-20 19:05

hot take women are not even real their government constructs created to poison the minds of men through spores that they release in the air

Fernando — Post 268 of 281

#268 2026-09-20 19:05

True.

Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

whereismyepipen — Post 269 of 281

#269 2026-09-20 19:12

Have you ever seen a woman? So, if you have never seen a woman in your life, how do you know that they truly exist? Thus,
if we are uncertain about their existence, we cannot discount the possibility that they are just holograms created by NASA.

LordJohnEdward — Post 270 of 281

#270 2026-09-20 19:13

Under what modality?

Fernando — Post 271 of 281

#271 2026-09-20 19:14

So are we just gonna ignore this one?
-- (LordJohnEdward):
Yo, what's up chat! Its about time I show my face around here and drop a contravercial take, so here it goes. I think my most contravercial take is that I believe that the state can justly apply the death penalty to apostates.
--

Chesterton, G.K. "When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing; they then become capable of believing in anything."

whereismyepipen — Post 272 of 281

#272 2026-09-20 19:14

the fact that we are uncertain

LordJohnEdward — Post 273 of 281

#273 2026-09-20 19:15

That's not a modality, your account of certainty is giving lukie ass!

whereismyepipen — Post 274 of 281

#274 2026-09-20 19:22

The modality is in the phrase “cannot discount the possibility.” Because I said “cannot discount,” it indicates that my claim cannot be ruled out. When I said “possibility,” it indicates that the hologram explanation is plausible, not certain. So, the modality is epistemic modality because it concerns the degree of certainty about whether women actually exist or are holograms.

LordJohnEdward — Post 275 of 281

#275 2026-09-20 19:22

You cannot have a modality be in a fraze that employs a modal verb! That's circular just like Lukie ass!

whereismyepipen — Post 276 of 281

#276 2026-09-20 19:26

l argument

LordJohnEdward — Post 277 of 281

#277 2026-09-20 19:26

Concession time, I'll take!

musicman5464 — Post 278 of 281

#278 2026-09-20 20:01

Bruh just...no. Explain how we were all born then.
-- (khalil2009):
hot take women are not even real their government constructs created to poison the minds of men through spores that they release in the air
--

Regards, Joseph

rudolf — Post 279 of 281

#279 2026-09-20 20:05

This makes sense once you leave the social construct the government wants you to believe. Think about it deeply.

djsenter — Post 280 of 281

#280 2026-09-20 20:09

A not so controversial take, I'm losing my brain cells reading your shit. Think it's about time I depart, tc.

Senter San