Edited
2 likes
MODERATION!
Arctic Moon has the right idea here. Rule 1.9 addresses this clearly. Neither of your posts advance the conversation in any meaningful way. Yes, fake/constructed languages do exist, and yes, they can be perfectly legitimate complete with structure, vocabulary and so on, but A, this appears to be an inside joke among the both of you, and B, you didn't even provide some kind of translation, which from the perspective of literally everyone else reading, appears simply, as gibberish.
Please refrane from such nonsensical posts and spam going forward.
Thank you.
Arctic Moon has the right idea here. Rule 1.9 addresses this clearly. Neither of your posts advance the conversation in any meaningful way. Yes, fake/constructed languages do exist, and yes, they can be perfectly legitimate complete with structure, vocabulary and so on, but A, this appears to be an inside joke among the both of you, and B, you didn't even provide some kind of translation, which from the perspective of literally everyone else reading, appears simply, as gibberish.
Please refrane from such nonsensical posts and spam going forward.
Thank you.